I
think that benchmarking, when used in the right context is a representative
reflection of affairs, especially in finance where it is numbers game. I analyzed
my portfolio performance and investment choices made.
These
are better presented in a table (all sum of money is in thousands):
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
|
Cumulative
|
21
|
140
|
202
|
215
|
303
|
303
|
Inflation adjusted
|
22
|
146
|
217
|
236
|
337
|
347
|
S&P500
|
23
|
173
|
265
|
280
|
412
|
440
|
Yearend value
|
20.7
|
141
|
169
|
167
|
316
|
304
|
Cumulative: The invested money added up
together.
Inflation
adjusted: The invested money adjusted
for the inflation and added up together (as if I would have invested in Treasury
Inflation Protected Securities aka TIPS).
S&P500: If I would invest money in
S&P500 (commissions are not included).
Yearend
value: Value of my portfolio at
the end of the year (including received dividends).
Here
is the same information presented on a chart and “how and why” this happened and what to do next.
Financial
independence overall performance:
Asset
specific in graphs, as picture paints a thousand of words. Gazprom
performance between 2012 -2017, including dividends:
Vanguard
S&P500 ETF performance 2014-2017:
You
see also Vanguard tries to mimic S&P500 there is differences. Admittedly
there is many options on how to interpret S&P500 (with dividends reinvested
or without, taxes, etc..)
Rosneft
shares performance 2013-2017, including received dividends:
Vanguard
emerging markets ETF performance (2014-2017), including dividends:
iShares
core DAX performance (2015-2017), in this fund the dividends are reinvested automatically:
iShares Emerging markets corporate bond ETF (2016-2017) including dividends:
With
raise of USD exchange rate, as well as federal reserve interest rate the value
of the emerging markets bonds went down to reflect increased risk (all bonds
are issued in USD).
iShares
Emerging markets sovereign bonds ETF performance
(2016-2017) including dividends:
Financial
independence portfolio review performance outcome:
I
used to focus on “cash engines”, which generate good dividends rather than growth. This was with intention to reach relatively quick financial independence. In 2016 over $10,000 after taxes was generated
on portfolio of $316 K or ~3%. S&P
would generate only ~ 1.5-2%. This now has changed and I no longer can afford to
invest so much money.
Lessons learnt: invest in
growth and when you are ready to go financially independent convert it into cash
engines. For example, if you accumulate $2 mln and
keep it in S&P500 this will generate $30K a year, while Emerging market corporate or
sovereign bonds ETF almost $80K a year.
I decided to sell all the funds I have and put the money into 4 simple funds:
Vanguard U.S. 500 Stock Index – expense ratio 0.25%
Vanguard Eurozone Stock Index – expense
ratio 0.35%
Vanguard Global Small Cap Index – expense
ratio 0.40%
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index - expense
ratio 0.40%
It will allow me to balance portfolio
between US, Europe and Emerging markets, weighting towards US significantly.
All the funds are set to auto invest any dividends I may receive and have relatively low expense ratio. The investment split 50/50 between EUR and USD.
Currently I have no intention to do any active
trading or changes at least until I find a better paid job which allow me to
earn & save more. I continue to save
what I can, which currently sits at around$500 a month. Perhaps this could be a safe area to
experiment on a small scale. The only obstacle is any transactions have a heavy
commission fees attached, which makes it less attractive.
How is your portfolio doing and what benchmark do you use to understand at what point are you towards your goals and objectives?
No comments:
Post a Comment