↑ EUR is up to USD by 3.8% or $12,370 for my portfolio
↑ GBP is up to USD by 3.2% or $2,530 for my portfolio
↑ Additional investment savings $2,500
Total gains: $17,400
↓ Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund is down by $4,735 or -3.2%
↓ Eurozone Stock Index Fund is down by $5,713 or -3.1%
↓ US 500 Stock Index Fund is down by $25,374 or -5.7%
↓ Global Small Cap is down by $6,331 or -3.8%
↓ Growth fund is down by $5,100 or -6.0%
Total losses: $47,254
↑ GBP is up to USD by 3.2% or $2,530 for my portfolio
↑ Additional investment savings $2,500
Total gains: $17,400
↓ Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund is down by $4,735 or -3.2%
↓ Eurozone Stock Index Fund is down by $5,713 or -3.1%
↓ US 500 Stock Index Fund is down by $25,374 or -5.7%
↓ Global Small Cap is down by $6,331 or -3.8%
↓ Growth fund is down by $5,100 or -6.0%
Total losses: $47,254
I feel lucky to
have a job and be able to advance my personal financial independence dream. I
was pondering on the strategies I should take when the S&P500 is down
almost 10% from its all-time high:
-
Should I use this opportunity and to buy in more S&P + global small cap (over 60% is in the USA)?
Most likely I need to work for 20 years before I can afford retirement. This
means I can tolerate some market fluctuation in the coming years.
-
I feel that I am fairly diversified by having emerging market, eurozone
and global small cap. Should I be going more towards bonds and precious metals
(gold is all time at $3,085 per troy ounce (~31.1 gram))?
-
Should I be keeping cash for now, like Berkshire Hathaway and many
others?
I think that people
have been accustomed to a steady ascent in U.S. Stocks. Buy low always seemed
to pay off, often almost immediately. Typically, the government would step in
and rescue businesses at expenses of the taxpayers.
There is different
game now, as the government is sobering up to $36 trillion national debt with
bonds. Even $154 billion saved by the
Department of Government Efficiency (so far) barely dents $6.8 trillion is
spending. The government is now paying $881 billion in interest and around $807
billion on wars and military (aka Defense budget). Rising interest rates making
the repayment sums higher.
I own stock not for
the stability of the US – China /Rest of the world trade relationship. I want to participate in the long-term growth
of world economy. I am not near
retirement so I can wait until dust settles. For US to restart there domestic manufacturing
and being energy independent is good thing for the rest of the world due to increased
competition. As I will be getting closer
to retirement I need to invest more into the bonds, treasuries and precious
metals to provide long term stability.
I am also re-framing
the question: instead of thinking of not selling at absolute peak price, to
measure how much I paid to begin with. Over past 8 years:
- Emerging stock market – 4% a year
- Global Small Cap - 6% a year
-
Eurozone – 6.5% a year
-
S&p500 – 12.5% a year
I am sitting at a
profit, not a loss. We live in a time where the stock’s market total return
(changes in prices + re-invested dividends) is possible at relatively low cost.
It wasn’t always the case and trading costs and fund expenses were vastly
higher in the past.
Brokerage costs
used to be exorbitant on small investments. In 1967, Murray Simpson of William
Jennings & Co., a brokerage firm, stated in testimony to the U.S. Senate
that an investor who put $100 apiece into 10 stocks would pay 6% in initial
commissions and another 6% to reinvest any dividends.
It worth to remember
that the Dow didn’t surpass its 1929 high until Nov.
23, 1954, a quarter-century later. That doesn’t include reinvested dividends,
but most investors surely took their dividends as cash in those days (with
dividends reinvested you would get back by 1949, i.e. 20 years later).
No comments:
Post a Comment